Louise Jeanne Parker (March 2009) …item 3.. Maxwell Smart Was Right (11.2.12 @ 6:07AM) – November 2012 …item 5.. CNET News – Like virginity, lost privacy is gone for good — CES panelist (January 7, 2013 3:56 PM PST) …
A few nice best online dating software reviews images I found:
Louise Jeanne Parker (March 2009) …item 3.. Maxwell Smart Was Right (11.2.12 @ 6:07AM) – November 2012 …item 5.. CNET News – Like virginity, lost privacy is gone for good — CES panelist (January 7, 2013 3:56 PM PST) …
Image by marsmet531
They are Western Civilization’s Lex Luther — an enemy of near-equal genius committed to a polar opposite set of principals and outcomes. Defeating them requires one core insight into the paradox: KAOS, the avatars of randomness, lust and nihilism, are ultimately a rational — even ordered — lot. They are as predictable as the natural urges that enslave them.
We have their number. All we need now is a shoe phone.
.
……..*****All images are copyrighted by their respective authors ……..
.
… message hearder for item 1.
As noted in life: How many people does it take to make a lie?? .. It takes only two (2) people…a lier is NO GOOD WITHOUT A BELIEVER !!..
A short pencil is better than a long memory !! When all else fails, read and follow the instructions.
… reference letter October 2009
.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
.
.
…..item 1)…. A person actions defines themself in society. Any false statements / allegations that they have heard and received as a matter of fact or being true…that are directed towards an unsuspected individual…personally reflects upon their "true color" CHARACTER. Their standards as i have been told back in 1966… they lack SALT, ETHICS, and INTEGRITY TO DO RIGHT… more than the perpetrator.
ja, das es ist…mehr oder weniger !!
NO SALT,
NO STANDARDS,
NO INTEGRITY TO SHOW / DO RIGHT.
… no class … plain and simple … enough said !!
This Louise J. Parker has no standards…just another self-serving, arrogant, southside PIN-HEAD !!
Sunday June 06, 2010
.
.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
.
…..item 2)…. Sunday October 25, 2009 @ 12:34PM EDT …
1)… Louise J. Parker
2)… To All Known…..Collaborators, Riff-Raff Associates, Rawhiders, Straddle-Fencers, Bushwhackers, Commancheros, Banditos, Compadres, and Amigos.
3)… Plus all others concerned.
.
.
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
.
…..item 3)…. The American Spectator … spectator.org …
ANOTHER PERSPECTIVE …
.
………………………
img code photo …
spectator.org/assets/db/13518159957901.jpg
………………………
.
Maxwell Smart Was Right
By JUDD MAGILNICK on 11.2.12 @ 6:07AM — November 2012
Islamism and Leftism may just be frenemies — but behind them lurks "KAOS."
spectator.org/archives/2012/11/02/maxwell-smart-was-right
It’s a puzzlement: Why do leftists tolerate radical Islam? Begging the question: What does the man who Newsweek’s cover declared is "the first gay president" think is going to happen once sharia comes to his zip code?
Great minds are flummoxed by the attraction of two seeming political opposites. Even the late, brilliant cynic Christopher Hitchens was surprised and stunned by the blasé 1989 response of his leftist then-pals to the Salman Rushdie fatwa. Lesser minds on the left try to justify the wacky attraction by viewing global jihad as primarily a violent spasm of the economically exploited. If not brothers, these Islamists must at least be their cousins in arms. University leftists comfortably ignore that "religious" motivation of fatwas, sharia, or honor killings because, in their world, everyone who’s educated knows that religion doesn’t exist.
No fan of the left, Newt Gingrich offers an alternate psychiatric solution, suggesting that the current president "has almost a psychological need to be totally blind to the realities of Islamic extremism…. as though he has a desperate need to believe in something which is totally false."
For those still not satisfied with an understanding of the leftist/Islamist cohabitation, dozens of alternative theories have sprung up (see hashtags "secret Muslim", "Saudi money," "Indonesian birth certificate").
Irrespective of whether any or all are true, these storylines have been unflinchingly driven against media ridicule and elite indifference by people trying to solve the Islam/leftism riddle. They look for that one hidden secret that will explain it all, much like the last page of an Agatha Christie story.
In the midst of our existential battle of civilizations, these conventional assessments of the Islam/Left dynamic are worse than facile or inadequate — they are dangerous. To make progress and crash flawed paradigms, we are well-served by the terminology if not the insight of one of the sixties’ less-heralded geopolitical strategists. We need to place both leftism and Islamism in a superset best called "KAOS".
Why KAOS? Readers of a certain age will remember Get Smart, a ’60s sitcom send-up of the cold war spy thrillers. Maxwell Smart was the American agent who assessed all threats to the country by unerringly telling his chief, "I think that KAOS is behind this." And, unerringly, he was right. Only a higher theory such as KAOS explains why two systems — mortal enemies by conventional metrics — can be working in covert tandem, often intuitively, with no strategic plan.
KAOS is neither an ideology nor a religion. It is a pagan — or at best pan-phenomenalistic liberation movement that seeks to release themselves and everyone else from the bonds of time, physics, and biology. As two congruent, malignant light beams refracting off reality at different angles, they measure success by their intellectual and physical deconstruction of Western Civilization.
Stripping away the flamboyant dross of "Allahu Akbar" and "power to the people," it becomes clear that all KAOS shares the same vital principals:
• Surrender to passion
KAOS is a cover for lusts. Passion rules the left, underlined by their affection for the color red. Cyclically, they mass and charge the barricades to lust, namely: family, religion, and the free market economy. Islamist lusts are served by defining their cravings as divine will. We all know how when a "religious" terrorist yields to the temptations of the flesh, it is termed "incongruous" or "schizophrenic." But that misses the point: in their zeal to slaughter, they eroticize violence and feed the same obsessions they seek in the strip clubs.
• Situational morality
To live in KAOS is to celebrate moral nullification. By releasing morality from its (Western) mooring, KAOS disqualifies failure. In prison, Islam offers a narrative to the felon that renders penitence and rehabilitation inoperative. And Marx says that if laws are tools of the ruling class, then breaking them is okay. Protections such as private property, voting, and citizenship are to be enforced only to the extent that they advance a known agenda.
• An attack on meaning
They’ll tell you that it’s all about a great, far off goal — but their behavior betrays their eschatology. There is never a meaningful arc of progress. Their goals are a sham — their interest is in an eternal present. Their perceived triumph comes from merely participating in this never-ending struggle. See H.R. Clinton’s senior thesis "There Is Only the Fight." Or the German book called "My Struggle" that ignited a war.
In the ahistorical environment of KAOS, there is no cause and effect — none of the empirical reasoning upon which Western Civilization rests. For us, "meaning" derives from our axiom of an ordered, non-random, time-based universe. Everything is built on that — from the patriarch Abraham discovering monotheism to Isaac Newton discovering science. In KAOS, meaning as we know it is an uninteresting and useless construct.
They are Western Civilization’s Lex Luther — an enemy of near-equal genius committed to a polar opposite set of principals and outcomes. Defeating them requires one core insight into the paradox: KAOS, the avatars of randomness, lust and nihilism, are ultimately a rational — even ordered — lot. They are as predictable as the natural urges that enslave them.
We have their number. All we need now is a shoe phone.
.
.
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
.
…..item 4)…. youtube video … Talking Heads – Remain In Light (Full Album) … 39:58 minutes …
www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4k1netwWr0
Published on Nov 1, 2012
www.facebook.com/KritikospaMusicChannel
Talking Heads – Remain in Light (1980)
Uploading November 01, 2012
Track Listing
01 00:00 "Born Under Punches (The Heat Goes On)"
02 05:47 "Crosseyed and Painless"
03 10:36 "The Great Curve"
04 17:03 "Once in a Lifetime"
05 21:26 "Houses in Motion"
06 26:00 "Seen and Not Seen"
07 29:25 "Listening Wind"
08 34:20 "The Overload"
All Music Review (Rating: 5/5)
www.allmusic.com/album/remain-in-light-mw0000192118
Wiki
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remain_in_Light
RateYourMusic (Rating: 4.23/5)
rateyourmusic.com/release/album/talking_heads/remain_in_l…
Category
Music
License
Standard YouTube License
.
.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
.
…..item 5)…. CNET News … Like virginity, lost privacy is gone for good — CES panelist …
news.cnet.com … CNET News Security & Privacy Like virginity, lost privacy is gone for good …
Far from the barrage of gadget announcements, a comparatively unsexy discussion on the future of privacy and cloud-stored data unspooled at CES 2013.
.
…………………
img code photo … security start kit …
asset1.cbsistatic.com/cnwk.1d/i/tim/2012/11/15/security_s…
…………………
.
by Seth Rosenblatt … January 7, 2013 3:56 PM PST
news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-57562592-83/like-virginity-lost…
LAS VEGAS — The future of privacy and the cloud occupied a sidestage at CES 2013 this morning, with one panelist comparing privacy lost to something else that can’t be replaced.
"Getting your privacy back is like getting your virginity back," said Jim Reavis, Executive Director of the non-profit Cloud Security Alliance, from a room on the second floor of Las Vegas Convention Center North building. The on-stage conversation between Reavis and other privacy experts focused mainly on desired changes to how to make the nebulous concept of online privacy more user-friendly.
Sid Stamm, lead privacy engineer for Mozilla, suggested that just because more and more data is being hosted remotely, "in the cloud," that doesn’t mean that it’s automatically less safe. "If we introduce transparency, we can make people feel safer about where their data is being stored," he said.
He also said that he thought that developers have to start matching data and privacy management to user expectation. "We should be engineering products which only do what [end-users] expect them to do. It may be harder, but it’s in our best interests," he said.
All four panelists — a group that included Rip Gerber, the CEO of Locaid Technologies and K. Scott Morrison, CTO of Layer 7 Technologies — agreed that not enough was being done to protect the privacy of the individual. That’s not exactly a revolutionary sentiment in the age of regular database breaches on improperly secured servers, although each panelist suggested slightly different fixes.
.
…………………………..
img code photo …
asset2.cbsistatic.com/cnwk.1d/i/tim/2013/01/07/IMG_4424_6…
Mozilla Lead Privacy Engineer Sid Stamm at CES 2013.
(Credit: Seth Rosenblatt/CNET)
…………………………..
.
Morrison noted a common problem with applying desktop privacy norms to the modern, mobile world. "It’s not reasonable to read a 50 page EULA on this thing," he said, holding up his iPhone. "I don’t know what better transparency looks like, but we’re getting closer to it."
Gerber, clad in a leather jacket despite the overly warm room, explained some of his company’s approach to customer privacy. "We follow three basic tenets: You have to ask permission (from the user before collecting their data), you have to notify (the user when you plan on doing something with their data), and you have to offer more control (over the data to the user)."
The panelists also addressed what they saw coming for privacy in the next year. "One thing we can bet on happening this year is acceleration in innovation," said Stamm. "I think we’re going to see more innovation in privacy. We’re going to be empowering users to use their information."
Reavis offered a concrete solution, from his own company’s practices, called format-preserving encryption. "Entrepreneurs are encrypting information before it goes up to the cloud. It’s been wholly transformational, and prevents a company from seeing what’s on its own database."
Reavis was not wholly enthusiastic about the future, though. "It’s the bad guy’s Internet, they just let us use it because it suits their financial interests," he said grimly.
Stamm agreed that this was a precarious time for user protections and privacy. "The worst thing that could happen in the next year," he said, "would be a privacy breach that we don’t understand."
Originally posted at CES 2013
Tags:CES 2013, data, privacy, cloud, online
About Seth Rosenblatt
Seth Rosenblatt is a senior editor at CNET, and has written about nearly every category of software and app available. At CNET since 2006, he currently focuses on browsers, security, and operating systems, with occasional forays into tech and pop culture.
.
.
.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
.
…..item 6)…. Leon County Clerk of Courts … CourtView 2000 Search Engine
cvweb.clerk.leon.fl.us/index.asp
.
37 2013 CA 000394 HOLMES, MARIE W vs SIZEMORE, LOUISE J PARKER
Name Type
HOLMES, MARIE W PLAINTIFF
SIZEMORE, LOUISE J PARKER DEFENDANT
SIZEMORE, ROGER D DEFENDANT
.
Party Party Type DOB Case Status Case Number
SIZEMORE, LOUISE J PARKER DEFENDANT OPEN 37 2013 CA 000394
.
37 2013 CA 000394 HOLMES, MARIE W vs SIZEMORE, LOUISE J PARKER
Plaintiffs Plaintiff Attorney(s)
HOLMES, MARIE W
MCLEOD, CLINTON E
Defendants Defendant Attorney(s)
SIZEMORE, LOUISE J PARKER
SIZEMORE, ROGER D
SANTURRI, RICHARD J
Attorneys Attorney(s)
Number: 37 2013 CA 000394
Action: NEGLIGENCE OTHER
Status: OPEN
Filed : 2/7/2013
Citation:
.
37 2013 CA 000394 HOLMES, MARIE W vs SIZEMORE, LOUISE J PARKER
Docket Date Docket Text Amount Amount Due OR_Book OR_Page
2/7/2013 SUMMONS ISSUED LOUISE J PARKER SIZEMORE (DEFENDANT); Receipt: 746483 Date: 02/07/2013.00
2/7/2013 CIVIL COVER SHEET
2/7/2013 COMPLAINT Receipt: 746483 Date: 02/07/2013 CLINTON E MCLEOD (Attorney) on behalf of MARIE W HOLMES (PLAINTIFF)0.00
2/11/2013 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED ON 2/7/13 ROGER D SIZEMORE (DEFENDANT);
2/27/2013 ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
3/1/2013 COPIES Receipt: 757253 Date: 03/01/2013.00
5/13/2013 VERIFIED EMERGENCY MOTION FOR INJUNCTION AND A RESTRAINING ORDER CLINTON E MCLEOD (Attorney) on behalf of MARIE W HOLMES (PLAINTIFF)
5/16/2013 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE LOUISE J PARKER SIZEMORE (DEFENDANT); ROGER D SIZEMORE (DEFENDANT);
5/23/2013 NOTICE OF VERIFIED EMERGENCY MOTION FOR INJUNCTIION AND RESTRAINING ORDER HEARING Event: NOTICE OF HEARING Date: 05/30/2013 Time: 10:30 am Judge: CARROLL, KEVIN J Location: CHAMBERS
.
37 2013 CA 000394 HOLMES, MARIE W vs SIZEMORE, LOUISE J PARKER
Event Date Start Location Judge
NOTICE OF HEARING 5/30/2013 10:30 AM C CARROLL
.
.
.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
.
.
Comments are closed.