the Temple Mount — Nov 13, 2011 / 16 Cheshvan 5772 …item 2.. One surefire way to avert a nuclear holocaust. — Let us not be caught unawares this time. (February 12, 2012 / 19 Shevat 5772) …
Some cool free dating site for single parents images:
the Temple Mount — Nov 13, 2011 / 16 Cheshvan 5772 …item 2.. One surefire way to avert a nuclear holocaust. — Let us not be caught unawares this time. (February 12, 2012 / 19 Shevat 5772) …
Image by marsmet542
Following the destruction of Jerusalem and Solomon’s Temple, many Jews were sent into exile. However, under the Persian King Cyrus, the Jews were allowed to return and began to rebuild the Temple.
The Second Temple was completed in 516 BCE and expanded by King Herod in 19 BCE. In 70 CE, the Roman Empire, led by Emperor Titus, laid siege to Jerusalem and destroyed the Second Temple.
Jews have maintained an unbreakable connection to Jerusalem, and the Temple Mount since that time.
.
…….****** All images are copyrighted by their respective authors ……
.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
.
…..item 1)…. aish.com … Denying the Temple … The belief that no Jewish Temple ever existed in Jerusalem has become a mounting problem.
.
……………………………………….
img code photo….. the Temple Mount ..
media.aish.com/images/DenyingTheTemple230x150-EN.jpg
……………………………………….
.
.
Nov 13, 2011 / 16 Cheshvan 5772
by David Barnett
www.aish.com/jw/me/Denying_the_Temple.html
On the ninth day of the 2000 Camp David Summit, Yasir Arafat, then Palestinian National Authority President, told President Bill Clinton that “Solomon’s Temple was not in Jerusalem, but Nablus.”[1] Arafat’s remark, known as “Temple Denial,” shook the foundation of the negotiations, as the leading Palestinian figure denied the existence of Judaism’s holiest site. Temple Denial is historical revisionism that runs counter to classical Islamic tradition and archaeological evidence. Since the 1967 Six-Day War, after Muslim control over the Temple Mount was lost to Israel, the belief that no Jewish Temple ever existed in Jerusalem has developed and become internalized within Palestinian academic, religious, and political circles. Since Camp David, Temple Denial has transformed into a virulent delegitimization campaign that attempts to deny both Jewish authority and access to the Temple Mount and Western Wall (or Wailing Wall) in Jerusalem.
JEWISH TIES TO JERUSALEM AND THE TEMPLE MOUNT
For Jews, the Temple Mount is the holiest place in the world. The Jewish connection to Jerusalem and the Temple Mount originates in the biblical narrative, as it is said to be the location of the binding of Isaac.[2] The Talmud, Judaism’s supreme canonical text, says that the foundation stone on the Temple Mount is the location from which the world was created.[3] In Samuel II 24:18-25, King David bought the bedrock for the Temple from Araunah the Jebusite. Subsequently, Solomon, David’s son, used the bedrock to build the First Temple.[4] Solomon’s Temple was eventually destroyed by Nebuchadnezzar II of Babylon in 586 BCE.
For Jews, the Temple Mount is the holiest place in the world.
Following the destruction of Jerusalem and Solomon’s Temple, many Jews were sent into exile. However, under the Persian King Cyrus, the Jews were allowed to return and began to rebuild the Temple. The Second Temple was completed in 516 BCE and expanded by King Herod in 19 BCE. In 70 CE, the Roman Empire, led by Emperor Titus, laid siege to Jerusalem and destroyed the Second Temple. Jews have maintained an unbreakable connection to Jerusalem, and the Temple Mount since that time.
Today, Jews follow a number of different customs in remembrance of their fallen Temple. When Jews pray, they pray toward Jerusalem. Within the daily liturgy, there are numerous calls for the rebuilding of Jerusalem and the Temple. During the week, after meals, Jews recite a grace, which includes the recitation of Psalm 137 (“If I forget thee, O Jerusalem…”).[5] At the end of a wedding ceremony, the groom breaks a glass, which signifies the Jewish people’s continued mourning over the Temple’s destruction. In addition, many have the custom of leaving a wall in their home unfinished in remembrance of the destruction. All of these customs play a significant part in the Jewish connection to Jerusalem and the Temple Mount, which former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert stated “represents the purist expression of all that Jews prayed for, dreamed of, cried for, and died for in the two thousand years since the destruction of the Second Temple.”[6] In addition to the customs and ideology, the Jewish connection to the Land of Israel and Jerusalem is internationally recognized.[7]
ISLAMIC LITERATURE AND THE TEMPLE MOUNT
Classic Islamic literature also recognizes the existence of a Jewish Temple and its importance to Judaism. This makes Palestinian Temple Denial all the more puzzling.
In Sura 17:1 of the Koran, the “Farthest Mosque” is called the al-masjid al-Aqsa. The Tafsir al-Jalalayn,[8] a well-respected Sunni exegesis of the Koran from the 15th and 16th centuries, notes that the “Farthest Mosque” is a reference to the Bayt al-Maqdis of Jerusalem.[9] In Hebrew, the Jewish Temple is often referred to as the Beyt Ha-Miqdash, nearly identical to the Arabic term. In the commentary of Abdullah Ibn Omar al-Baydawi, who authored several prominent theological works in the 13th century, the masjid is referred to as the Bayt al-Maqdis because during Muhammad’s time no mosque existed in Jerusalem.[10] Koranic historian and commentator, Abu Jafar Muhammad al-Tabari, who chronicled the seventh century Muslim conquest of Jerusalem, wrote that one day when Umar finished praying, he went to the place where “the Romans buried the Temple [bayt al-maqdis] at the time of the sons of Israel.”[11] In addition, eleventh century historian Muhammad Ibn Ahmad al-Maqdisi and fourteenth century Iranian religious scholar Hamdallah al-Mustawfi acknowledged that the al-Aqsa Mosque was built on top of Solomon’s Temple.[12]
This is a small sample of the Islamic literature attesting to the Jewish connection to the Temple Mount. Innumerable other writings from other faiths attest to this fact, as well.
Related Article: The Big Lie: The Muslims, Jerusalem and Archaeology, Part 1
.
……………………………………….
The Big Lie: The Muslims, Jerusalem and Archaeology, Part 1
www.aish.com/jw/me/68495827.html
The Arab onslaught to erase the Jewish people’s historical connection with the Temple Mount.
by Rabbi Leibel Reznick
…………………………………………
.
.
THE TEMPLE MOUNT DURING THE PALESTINE MANDATE
The modern phenomenon of Temple Denial began during the Palestine Mandate. During this period, the Temple Mount was under the authority of the Supreme Muslim Council, led by the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem Haj Amin al-Husayni. The Supreme Muslim Council published yearly guide books to the Haram al-Sharif (the Temple Mount). Drawing from those available, the 1924, 1925, 1929, and 1935 guide books all stated that the Haram al-Sharif’s “identity with the site of Solomon’s Temple is beyond dispute. This, too, is the spot, according to the universal belief, on which David built there an altar unto the Lord, and offered burnt offerings and peace offerings.”[13] The recognition of the Temple Mount’s importance to Jews in the guidebooks continued until 1950, two years after Israel’s establishment.[14]
However, by 1954, the references to Solomon’s Temple disappeared. At some point between 1950 and 1954, the Muslim waqf (religious authority) that governed the Dome of the Rock and the al-Aqsa Mosque inexplicably began to remove the references seen in earlier guide books.
One of the earliest cases of Temple Denial occurred in the aftermath of the Arab disturbances of August 1929, which erupted over disputes between Jews and Muslims regarding access to the Western Wall.
These riots led to the Hebron and Safed massacres and the death of 133 Jews and 116 Arabs. Following the riots and due to pressure from the Mandates Commission of the League of Nations, an international investigative body examined Jewish and Muslim claims to the Western Wall. This investigation led to the Report of the Commission Appointed by His Majesty’s Government in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, with the Approval of the Council of the League of Nations, to Determine the Rights and Claims of Moslems and Jews in Connection with the Western or Wailing Wall at Jerusalem.[15]
The report acknowledged Jewish claims to the Temple Mount, noting, “It was Solomon who built the first Temple of Jerusalem."
The report acknowledged Jewish claims to the Temple Mount, noting, “It was Solomon who built the first Temple of Jerusalem, the grandeur and beauty of which have become widely renowned, thanks to the holy books and the historians. The Temple was situated on Mount Moriah on the platform, now known as the Harem-esh-Sherif area.”[16] Despite this acknowledgement, the Muslim claim formulated within the report stated, “It is here a question about property which has belonged to the Moslems for many centuries. The Buraq forms an integral part of the Haram-esh-Sherif, not a single stone of which dates back to the days of Solomon.”[17] This claim played a pivotal role in the commission’s conclusion, which recognized the significance of the Western Wall to Jews, but deemed the site a Muslim property.[18]
THE RISE OF TEMPLE DENIAL
During the 1967 Six-Day War, Israel launched a preemptive strike against its neighboring enemies and conquered all of the Sinai Peninsula, the Golan Heights, and the West Bank, including the Temple Mount. Following the Israeli victory, Israel claimed sovereignty over the Temple Mount and the government immediately passed the Protection of Holy Places Law.[19] While Israel now controlled the Temple Mount, it left administrative control in the hands of the waqf. Yet Israel’s claim of sovereignty did not sit well with many in the Muslim world, sparking fears of Jewish aspirations to usurp all of Jerusalem and the Temple Mount. Defending Jerusalem from the Jews quickly became the centerpiece of the nascent Palestinian political ideology.[20] The first step in denying Jewish control was denying the Jewish connection to the site. Palestinian historians soon launched a campaign to deny the importance of Jerusalem and the Temple Mount to Jews. The new writings quickly spread throughout the Arab world.
These texts typically argued that any Jewish presence in Jerusalem was less significant than the Muslim one.[21] To that end, the existence of Solomon’s Temple was denied. In cases where the existence of Solomon’s Temple was acknowledged, it was described as a minor prayer room. In addition, the Western Wall was deemed a Muslim holy site, while the Jewish connection was declared to be a falsehood.[22] These claims have only risen in popularity throughout pro-Palestinian circles in the Muslim world since 1967.
In the more recent writings, the denial of Solomon’s Temple is expressed through the use of the word al-maz’um (alleged) with al-haykal (the Temple). The use of the word al-maz’um is a direct attempt to negate the Jewish claim to the Temple Mount.[23] The main argument made by those who deny the existence of the Jewish Temple is that no proof of the Temple’s existence has ever been found.
Palestinian officials have adopted this position. Former Director of Foreign Publications for the Palestinian Authority’s (PA) Ministry of Information Walid Awad stated, “The fact of the matter is that almost thirty years of excavations did not reveal anything Jewish… …Jerusalem is not a Jewish city, despite the biblical myth implanted in some minds.”[24] Jordanian academic Arafat Hijazi wrote, “42 archaeological teams excavated at al-Aqsa between 1891-1925 and hundreds have excavated since 1967, but not one archeologist has found a remnant of the Temple or any indication of the existence of Jews in Palestine.”[25] Abd al-Rahim Rihan Barakat, the director of antiquities in the Dahab region of the Sinai, further declared, “The legend about the Jewish Temple is the greatest historic crime of forgery.”[26]
TEMPLE DENIAL WITHIN ACADEMIC, RELIGIOUS, AND POLITICAL CIRCLES
Temple Denial is now a popular narrative in universities in the Muslim world. The denial of the Jewish connection to the Temple Mount and the Land of Israel often take on traditional anti-Semitic motifs, even in academic settings. Jordanian academic Muhammad Dohal, for example, asserted that the Jewish connection to Palestine is a modern creation that is part of a Jewish plan to rule the region “through active control, media control, or economic control.”[27] Just as the Jewish connection to the Land of Israel is viewed as an imperialist plan, the belief in the Temple is viewed as an imminent threat to the al-Aqsa compound. Former Chief Justice of the Religious Court of Palestine and Chairman of the Islamic-Christian Council for Jerusalem and the Holy Places Shaykh Taysir al-Tamimi declared, “The worrying silence of the nation is what is encouraging the occupation [Israel] to carry out its plans against Al-Aqsa… The Al-Aqsa Mosque is currently subject to domination and desecration and transformation into a synagogue.”[28]
In 2005, Shaykh Dr. Ahmad Nawfal, a lecturer at the Shari’a Faculty of the University of Jordan, argued, “The Jews dug 40 meters into the ground, and found nothing. There is no indication that a temple existed there. Brothers, they are making fun of you. Unfortunately, we are unwittingly legitimizing this nonsense of theirs. This is nonsense. This is heresy and blasphemy against God, history, human beings, and common sense.”[29] The idea of the Temple Mount having a Jewish connection is worrisome for many Palestinians, thus they argue that until hard evidence is shown, it is a forgery; and when pro-Palestinian writers and scholars admit that the Temple did exist, it is usually argued that it was not near the al-Aqsa compound.[30]
Former Grand Mufti of Jerusalem Shaykh Ikrima Sabri, arguably the leading Temple denier, stated on many occasions that the Jewish connection to the Temple was a myth. In a 1998 interview with the Israeli newspaper Makor Rishon, Shaykh Sabri voiced his opinion:
….. Moslems have no knowledge or awareness that the Temple Mount has any sanctity for Jews. Why should we allow the Jews to share in places which are holy to us and to Islam… The Moslems ruled the land, since the Caliph Omar, and only now have the Jews remembered to demand a right to the Temple Mount. The Moslems will never permit anyone to enter the Temple Mount. If the Jews really want peace, they must absolutely forget about having any rights over the Temple Mount or al-Aksa Mosque. The Western Wall also belongs to Moslems, and was given to the Jews as a place of prayer only because the British asked and the Moslems agreed out of the goodness of their hearts. The Western Wall is just a fence belonging to a Moslem Holy Site.[31]
Similarly, the aforementioned al-Tamimi stated, “I know of Muslim and Christian holy sites in [Jerusalem]. I don’t know of any Jewish holy sites in it… Israel has been excavating since 1967 in search of remains of their Temple or their fictitious Jewish history.”[32] The current Mufti of Jerusalem, Shaykh Muhammad Hussein asserted that Jews “claim that the Al-Aqsa Mosque was built over the ruins of the alleged Temple. The construction of these buildings [by Israel], and the synagogues with the large, wide domes [in Jerusalem] – all of this is meant to erase the remains of the Islamic culture and to replace them with [their] alleged culture, through the power of occupation.”[33] For some, like the Al-Aqsa Institute for Religious Affairs and Heritage, Jewish activity in Jerusalem is viewed as part of a satanic plot:
….. There is increasing Israeli occupationist madness [aiming] to harm the Al-Aqsa Mosque in order to realize a dark and fabled dream–the establishment of the alleged Temple in place of the Al-Aqsa Mosque… All the Israeli actions in Jerusalem and at the Al-Aqsa Mosque are part of a satanic plot, and therefore the position is worrying and most dangerous. Action must be taken to halt this criminal occupationist activity against the Al-Aqsa Mosque and Jerusalem.[34]
While the denial from religious leaders is troublesome, since many Muslims take their cue from their clerics, the most damaging narrative may come from Palestinian politicians, among whom this phenomenon has risen sharply since the 2000 Camp David Summit. At Camp David, while meeting with President Clinton, Arafat declared that “Solomon’s Temple was not in Jerusalem, but Nablus.”[35] In addition, Saib Arikat, a leading Palestinian negotiator said, “This whole issue of the Temple… is a Jewish invention lacking any basis.”[36] These claims were retorted by President Clinton, who said that “not only the Jews but I, too, believe that under the surface there are remains of Solomon’s Temple.”[37]
In late July 2000, Nabil Sha’ath, a Palestinian minister, said, “Israel demands control of the Temple Mount based on its claim that its fictitious temple stood there.”[38] Two years after Camp David, Arafat changed his claim as he asserted that there is “not a single stone proving that the Temple of Solomon was there, because historically the Temple was not in Palestine [at all].”[39] Arafat furthered his claims in 2003 during a presentation to a delegation of Arab leaders in which he argued that the Jewish Temple never existed in Jerusalem, but rather it existed in Yemen and that he had personally visited the site.[40]
Mahmoud Abbas also engaged in Temple Denial when he said that Jews “claim that 2000 years ago they had a holy place there. I challenge the assertion."
Arafat’s successor, Mahmoud Abbas, also engaged in Temple Denial when he said that Jews “claim that 2000 years ago they had a holy place there. I challenge the assertion [that there has ever been a Jewish temple].”[41] More recently, Yasir Abd Rabbo, Secretary-General of the PLO Executive Committee, asserted, “[Israel] entered the [Muslim] holy sites [in Jerusalem], in order to fulfill a legend and basing themselves on it… in order to build what is called the false Temple.”[42] Temple Denial has spread throughout many circles because the al-Aqsa compound has become the centerpiece of Palestinian political thought.[43] The fact that the al-Aqsa compound is viewed as a national symbol has moved the denial beyond just the Temple Mount.
DENYING JEWISH TIES TO THE WESTERN WALL
The phenomenon of Temple Denial today includes the Western Wall. The denial of a Jewish connection to the Western Wall is an attempt to restrict the Jewish right to pray at the holy site. Indeed, the attempt to deny Jewish rights to pray at the Western Wall was seen in the aforementioned 1930 League of Nations report. The report, which claimed that the Western Wall was Muslim property, provided the foundation from which current Palestinian scholars, religious, and political leaders reject the Jewish connection to the site.
In general the Palestinian denial of the importance of the Western Wall to Jews is based on three principles. First, there is the claim that Muhammad tethered his steed, al-Buraq, to the Western Wall on his night journey before having the Koran related to him. This implies that Islam’s claim on the site supersedes that of the Jews. Second, and as a possible means to strengthen their own claims, they posit that Jews invented the Western Wall as a holy site. Third, Jews have no historical claim to the site.
These ideas are regularly presented by Palestinians and their supporters in the Muslim world.[44] In 2002, Arafat Hijazi wrote that Muslims “must redeem from its state of desecration occupied al-Buraq, whose sanctity has been violated by the Jews… They can wail anywhere, while the Muslims have no other place where the Prophet tethered al-Buraq.”[45] These ideas were supported by Shaykh Ikrima Sabri who said:
….. There is not [even] the smallest indication of the existence of a Jewish temple on this place in the past. In the whole city, there is not even a single stone indicating Jewish History. Our right, on the other hand, is very clear. This place belongs to us for 1500 years. Even when it was conquered by the Crusaders, it remained Al-Aqsa, and we got it back soon afterwards. The Jews do not even know exactly where their temple stood. Therefore, we do not accept that they have any rights, underneath the surface or above it… There is not a single stone in the Wailing-Wall relating to Jewish History. The Jews cannot legitimately claim this wall, neither religiously nor historically.[46]
Shaykh Sabri, along with Dr. Nasr Farid Wasil, the former Mufti of Egypt, also issued fatwas (religious edicts) that prohibit Muslims from referring to al-Buraq as the Wailing Wall.[47] In September 2010, a PA TV documentary showed Jews praying at the Western Wall, during which the narrator said, “They [Israelis] know for certain that our [Palestinian] roots are deeper than their false history. We, from the balcony of our home, look out over [Islamic] holiness and on sin and filth [Jews praying at the Western Wall].”[48]
In a study published by the PA Ministry of Information in November 2010, al-Mutawakil Taha, the author of the report, wrote, “The Zionist occupation falsely and unjustly claims that it owns this wall, which it calls the Western Wall or Kotel… this wall was never part of the so-called Temple Mount, but Muslim tolerance allowed the Jews to stand in front of it and weep over its destruction.”[49] The study, which is the official position of the PA,[50] concluded that “no Muslim or Arab or Palestinian had the right to give up one stone of Al-Buraq Wall or other religious sites.”[51] Following strong condemnations by Israel and the United States, the study was removed from the official website of the PA’s Ministry of Information.[52] However, it soon reappeared on the official website of the Palestinian Authority’s news agency, Wafa.[53]
CONCLUSION
Despite running counter to Islamic tradition, Temple Denial has since 1967 remained an integral part of the Palestinian nationalist ideology, which is predicated on the rejection of Zionism and Jewish ties to the Land of Israel.[54] The continued spread of Temple Denial poses a serious problem to a peace process based on coexistence and mutual recognition. As the debate intensifies over the final status issues, including the Temple Mount, Temple Denial must now be addressed.
This article originally appeaered on www.gloria-center.org
Click here for the footnotes.
media.aish.com/documents/Denying+the+Temple.pdf
.
.
.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
.
…..item 2)…. aish.com … HOME ISRAEL JEWISH WORLD
Israel’s Vital First Strike
One surefire way to avert a nuclear holocaust.
.
………………………………………
img code photo … Israel’s Vital First Strike …
media.aish.com/images/Israel’s_Vital_First_Strike_(medium)_(english).jpg
………………………………………
.
by Sara Yoheved Rigler
February 12, 2012 / 19 Shevat 5772
www.aish.com/jw/s/48923017.html
If you were a Jew in Europe in 1941, and you actually knew that Hitler was developing the means to carry out his threat to exterminate the Jews, what would you do? Dismiss the danger as overstated? Try to arouse the nations of the world to stop him? Or take upon yourself to employ every means possible — both physically and spiritually — to avert the catastrophe?
If you are a Jew in 2007, and you actually know that Ahmadinejad is developing the means to carry out his threat to exterminate the Jews of Israel, what will you do?
This is the most pressing question of our times.
The Jewish people today faces the greatest threat since the Holocaust. Islamofascism, which up to now has satisfied its murderous zeal with bus bombings in Israel and synagogue bombings in France, with beating up hapless Jews in London and New York, is soon to acquire a nuclear bomb.
"When someone says he is going to exterminate you, believe him."
Would it really use it to destroy Israel and its people? Despite the wishful thinking of those pundits who assure us that Iran would never push the button, every thinking Jew should take seriously the statement quoted by Benyamin Netanyahu in a recent CNN documentary on the threat of Islamofascism. Mr. Netanyahu had asked a survivor what he had learned from the Holocaust. His reply: "When someone says he is going to exterminate you, believe him."
—–THE THREE-PRONGED APPROACH
Click here to receive Aish.com’s free weekly email.
Three weeks ago aish.com published an article by Jerusalem Post journalist Caroline Glick, entitled, "Wake Up, Jews!" Ms. Glick eloquently described the threat from Iran and argued that Israel should take radical measures, including planning a pre-emptive strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities, toppling the Iranian regime, and Israelis taking to the streets to force our government into action. "In a few months," Ms. Glick writes, "Iran may well be in possession of nuclear weapons which it will use to destroy the Jewish state. With the US withdrawing from the war and Israel in the hands of incompetents, the time has come for the Jewish people to rise up."
Ms. Glick is correct in everything she said, but I was troubled by what she didn’t say. A Jewish response to the threat of nuclear extinction that includes only physical (political and military) solutions but omits spiritual solutions is doomed to failure, just as a test with 50% correct answers merits a failing grade.
When the Patriarch Jacob and his family faced the danger of being slaughtered by Esau, who was rapidly approaching with 400 armed men, Jacob responded in three ways: he sent gifts to Esau; he employed strategy by dividing his camp into two; and he prayed.
Nachmonides, the 12th century Spanish sage, wrote that Jews must employ this triple approach throughout the ages whenever danger looms:
1. Diplomacy
2. Military strategy
3. Spiritual response
According to Rabbi Asher Weiss, Jacob’s "prayer" includes both prayer and teshuva, which he defines as changing one’s actions in order to come closer to God.
—–SPIRITUAL CAUSALITY
Many Jews equate spiritual response with "doing nothing." They fail to realize two of the most important principles underlying existence: 1) that the spiritual dimension is real and 2) that the spiritual dimension is causal.
The spiritual dimension includes God, souls, and spiritual forces. The materialistic approach to reality, which co-opted the Western mind over the last three centuries, believes that only the physical dimension is real; if something can’t be seen, touched, or detected by scientific instruments, it doesn’t exist.
Everyone who loves knows that this is untrue. We know that, even if neurobiologists can locate the site in the brain associated with feelings of love, love is a spiritual force that overrides the most basic physical instinct of self-preservation. And we recognize other attributes of the soul — courage, devotion to truth, and the search for meaning — as real, despite science’s inability to measure them.
Yet even many people who believe in the existence of God fail to understand that the spiritual dimension is causal. The universe, like any well-run corporation, operates by a chain of command from above to below.
A survivor of Katrina standing on a rooftop in New Orleans waiting for hours to be rescued may blame the rescue workers manning the boats. Later investigation, however, would reveal that the failures of the rescue teams stemmed from the lack of preparedness in the pertinent municipal and state agencies.
Further investigation would reveal that the source of the failure went even higher — to the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Similarly, whatever happens anywhere in the cosmos is ultimately regulated by the highest cosmic authority: God. If you want to change what happens here in the lowest of all worlds, the physical world, you would do well to address yourself to the top, to God.
Once we acknowledge God as the ultimate source of everything that happens, the next step is to recognize that human beings in this lowest world have the power to influence Divine edicts. Rabbi Yaacov Haber likens the chain of cosmic causality to rain. Rain obviously comes from above to below, yet rain production is a cycle. The evaporation of water here below creates clouds, which in turn empty their moisture as rain.
Just as polluted water causes acid rain, so "polluted" actions in this world cycle up and cause harmful edicts to descend upon human beings. The converse is also true. Acts of teshuva — of coming closer to God — can reverse even the most severe Divine decree.
—–SOUL SEARCHING
The Talmud poses a seemingly rhetorical question: What caused the destruction of the Second Temple? The Talmudic sages, who still lived under Roman domination, must have known the obvious answer. The Roman Empire, which controlled the entire known world, dominated Judea. The Jews rebelled against Rome, inciting the Great Revolt. Three Roman legions were dispatched to Judea to quell the rebellion. They encircled Jerusalem, put a siege on the city, and finally broke through the walls, decimated the city, and destroyed the Temple.
If Israel is destroyed, it will be by an Iranian nuclear missile, but not because of an Iranian nuclear missile.
While these are the historical facts known to every child of that period, the Talmud ignores this chain of events as being causal. Instead, it answers its own question: The Temple was destroyed because of causeless hatred among Jews. The sages thus made a distinction between the circumstances of the destruction and the cause of the destruction.
If Israel is destroyed, it will be by an Iranian nuclear missile, but not because of an Iranian nuclear missile. The cause of our annihilation will be our spiritual failures.
The present nuclear threat from Iran is not the first time that the specter of extermination of the Jews has issued from that country. How did the Jews of 2363 years ago respond to the contemporary Persian ruler’s decree to exterminate every Jewish man, woman, and child?
They did mass teshuva. They fasted, repented, and cried out to God. The Divinely orchestrated salvation of Purim was the result.
Rabbi Noah Weinberg, the dean of Aish HaTorah, has pointed out that the Persian Jews’ choice to respond spiritually to the looming physical danger is significant. When Haman, the Prime Minister of Persia, issued a ruling that everyone must bow down to him as he passed on the street, Mordechai the Jew refused. The Jewish leaders of the time remonstrated with Mordechai not to provide a pretext for Haman to vent his anti-Semitism: "If you don’t bow, we’ll all be killed."
Nevertheless, Mordechai refused to bow. Haman became enraged, and convinced the King to issue an edict of extermination against all the Jews in the Empire. At that point, the Jewish leaders, who had warned Mordechai not to resist Haman’s authority, could have easily come back to Mordechai and blamed him for causing their collective doom.
Instead, they recognized that God runs the world, and that God would not wipe out the Jewish people because Mordechai refused to bow to Haman. They realized that the law of spiritual causality dictates that they must search their own souls for the spiritual cause of the edict of annihilation. They went to Mordechai and admitted: "You were right. This catastrophe has come upon us because we participated in the King’s banquet [celebrating the destruction of the First Temple] nine years ago."
Of course we must respond militarily, but our first strike must be spiritual.
The spiritual response preceded the military response. The Jews’ teshuva brought down Divine clemency that foiled Haman’s plot and wrought his downfall. Nevertheless, the original royal edict could not be rescinded. Instead, Mordechai, the new Prime Minister of Persia who now possessed the royal seal, issued a second edict empowering the Jews to battle their enemies. Although most of the gentiles in the Empire understood that the tide had turned in favor of the Jews, many die-hard anti-Semites rose up to kill Jews on the appointed day. They were met with a valiant Jewish counter-attack, which, according to the Book of Esther, left 75,800 dead. The spiritual response did not preclude the military response, but it did precede it.
—–OUR RESPONSE
We are living out a modern-day Purim story. Iran’s developing of a nuclear bomb, coupled with Ahmadinejad’s vociferous threats to destroy Israel, are nothing less than an edict of extermination. Of course we must respond militarily, but our first strike must be spiritual.
Teshuva means changing course. It means doing something different than you’ve done before. It means coming closer to God by accepting on yourself to do God’s will in some area of your life where previously you had resisted.
As in the events of Purim, our response to the looming holocaust from Iran must be mass teshuva. This means that all Jewish men and women, whether they define themselves as religious, secular, or somewhere in between, must undertake to do a mitzvah that they were previously not performing. The step must be big enough to constitute a real change, but not too daunting to successfully incorporate into one’s life.
Some suggestions:
…..To stop putting down groups of Jews, no matter how much you disagree with their ways. [mitzvah of not speaking lashon hara]
…..For women: To light Shabbat candles before sunset Friday.
…..For men: To put on tefillin once a week.
…..To learn Torah one hour a week more than you presently do. This could mean signing up with Partners in Torah or attending a class at your local synagogue. [mitzvah of learning Torah]
…..To honor your parents in a way you have not previously done. [Note: all mitzvah observance requires learning the relevant laws.]
…..To stop eating dairy and meat products in the same meal.
…..To incorporate prayer into your life on a daily basis. Buy a Jewish prayer book and learn how to use it.
…..To make peace with a relative or friend from whom you are estranged. [mitzvah of loving your neighbor]
…..And to do whatever you choose to do with the intention of drawing closer to the Divine will and becoming a better Jew.
This is Europe, 1941. The Final Solution is being readied. I plead with you not to exit this article without committing yourself to some kind of specific spiritual response to ward off the looming genocide. Please use the comment section below to write in the specific commitment you will undertake.
As a Jew in Israel, I feel the encroaching doom from Iran. My life and the lives of my children are at stake. Indeed, because we are truly one people with one destiny, all of our lives are at stake. Let us not be caught unawares this time.
Take a moment to write your specific commitment to change in the comment section below.
Sara Yoheved Rigler will be giving workshops and lectures on the West Coast in February. To invite her to your community, please write to amblevy@yahoo.com.
.
.
.
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
.
.
Miami, Florida (1947) … Facebook Overexposure – it’s the traditional holiday letter on steroids! (December 27, 2012 / 14 Tevet 5773) …item 2.. A warming and simple pasta and broccoli dish (Thursday, 12.27.12) …
Image by marsmet546
Another friend of mine told me that, for her contemporaries (closer to my age than high school!), Facebook has become a brag book, an opportunity to post about exotic vacations, fancy home remodels, and children’s college acceptances (it’s the traditional holiday letter on steroids!) – all under the innocent ruse of “just keeping you up-to-date, just sharing information.”
.
……..*****All images are copyrighted by their respective authors ……..
.
Contents
Pg… 9 The Week’s Events: U.S. Troops Leave Italy on its Own
Pg… 14 The Week’s Events: Editorial: Inflation
Pg… 15 The Week’s Events: Car Kills Horse, Flings Body in Back Seat
Pg… 16 The Week’s Events: Russia and the West Cut Germany in Half
Pg… 18 The Week’s Events: Lillie Winter is Again Acquitted of Poisoning
.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
.
…..item 1)…. Facebook Overexposure … www.aish.com/f/mom …
Facebook poses a serious threat to our character.
Home » Family » Mom With A View …
.
…………………….
img code photo … Facebook Overexposure
media.aish.com/images/MomFacebookOverexposure230x.jpg
…………………….
.
December 27, 2012 / 14 Tevet 5773
by Emuna Braverman
www.aish.com/f/mom/Facebook-Overexposure.html
“What’s your position on Facebook?” my friend was asked at her daughter’s high school interview.
My friend, a computer-savvy and hands-on parent was prepared. “All of our computers are in an open public area with access to websites closely monitored. We also have an excellent filter in place and I have sole knowledge of the password.”
“Great,” responded the principal, as she scoured her list for the next question. Clearly they were done with this topic. But had they really covered it?
Of course, it’s important to supervise our children’s involvement with social media. But the reasons are deeper and more complex than the aforementioned principal and most of us recognize. It’s not just about predators. That’s the most sensational and frightening threat. There are no words to deal with the horror it invokes. But (I’m without statistics here but I’m sure my readers will set me right), I’m not sure the chances of an actual person-to-person encounter are that great. Yes, one is too many. But when one danger takes all our focus, we may miss more subtle or insidious risks.
I think that Facebook poses a serious threat to our character – in a few ways.
Another friend of mine told me that, for her contemporaries (closer to my age than high school!), Facebook has become a brag book, an opportunity to post about exotic vacations, fancy home remodels, and children’s college acceptances (it’s the traditional holiday letter on steroids!) – all under the innocent ruse of “just keeping you up-to-date, just sharing information.”
Not only does my friend suspect their motives but she laments how it affects her – her wonderful family trip now seems inadequate, her house too small and poorly furnished, her children’s academic achievements lackluster. The flame of jealousy has been ignited and fueled. Feelings of dissatisfaction are stoked as others chime in with their “I can beat yours” vacation and home stories. And, of course, with it the potential to put down this “fortunate” friend through slander…But that isn’t all.
The often overlooked consequence of posting every (or main) details of one’s life on Facebook is a loss of modesty, of dignity, of preservation of the inner self. If every idea, photo, experience, is shared with (hundreds of) friends, what remains of our inner core, our interior selves? Judaism teaches modesty as a way of being – not just in dress but in attitude. It’s how we speak – the tone, the words, the content. It’s how we carry ourselves. It’s how we guard what’s private, what’s special, what’s unique. It’s the sense that the life of the soul takes precedence over the life of the body. It’s the opposite of Facebook exposure.
Everyone else is sharing every deal; how can I not respond in kind? I confess to not having faced the challenge. I never go to the site. I’ve never friended or been friended by anyone (I think I still have a fulfilling life!). I haven’t experienced the thrill of contacting long-lost acquaintances or the ease of the instant advice on what to feed my kids for dinner.
I haven’t bragged about my last vacation (maybe if I could remember it I would) or read of anyone else’s with eager (and frustrated) longing. There are enough opportunities for jealousy without seeking out more.
Click here to receive Aish.com’s free weekly email.
I haven’t been put in a position where spilling personal details is de rigueur – and so easy to do. I haven’t faced the challenge so I don’t have all the solutions or strategies.
But I do know that when we have something special and precious, we want to preserve it. We put fences around our fancy homes and hide our fine jewelry in our safes. Fences help us avoid temptation.
We’re all at risk. Facebook encourages us to let down our guard. It rewards behavior that is the antithesis of the Jewish goal of modesty. The result is an unfortunate insensitivity to the idea of privacy and inner dignity. I’m afraid that may be the biggest risk of all to our children, and the one my friend’s principal was the least prepared to confront.
.
.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
.
.
…..item 2)… A warming and simple pasta and broccoli dish … The Miami Herald …
Posted on Thursday, 12.27.12
PASTA AND BROCCOLI
A warming and simple pasta and broccoli dish
.
………………………….
img code photo … Broccoli pasta
media.miamiherald.com/smedia/2012/12/26/15/24/1etcPC.Em.5…
MATTHEW MEAD / AP
………………………….
.
BY SARA MOULTON
ASSOCIATED PRESS
www.miamiherald.com/2012/12/27/3157357/a-warming-and-simp…
Whenever I have too little time and too few ingredients on hand — or when I’ve been eating too much meat — I cook up some broccoli pasta.
Which means I make it for dinner about once every 10 days! It’s delicious, healthy, inexpensive and easy to prepare. The recipe, in fact, is a cinch, consisting of just a few ingredients — pasta, chicken broth, Parmigiano-Reggiano, olive oil and a large head of the namesake crucifer. I always have four of those ingredients in house, so all I need to do is run out and pick up some broccoli and I’m good to go.
Another of this recipe’s charms is its flexibility. I can swap in vegetable broth for chicken broth, spaghetti for the angel hair pasta, and any other grated hard cheese for the Parmigiano-Reggiano. Sometimes I’ll even lose the broccoli in favor of roasted cauliflower or Brussels sprouts.
But what makes the dish so popular in my house is its comfort factor. I serve it soupy, so you can slurp the chicken broth along with the strands of pasta. I also make sure there’s some crusty bread within easy reach, which helps to mop up the broth not captured with a spoon.
In the original version of this recipe (I’ve been making it for years), I sauteed the broccoli in olive oil over very high heat until it was quite brown around the edges. The problem with this method is that the broccoli quickly soaked up all the olive oil and I always ended up having to add quite a bit more. I switched to oven-roasting it, which helps to decrease the amount of olive oil necessary. It also requires very little baby-sitting.
This dish is so economical it’s almost ecological. I use all of the broccoli, not just the florets. For years I used to trash the stems, but the stems are also plenty edible. Just peel off the skin, cut them up, and you’re ready.
.
……………………………………
.
img code photo … Broccoli pasta
media.miamiherald.com/smedia/2012/12/26/15/24/1etcPC.Em.5…
MATTHEW MEAD / AP
.
Main dish
— COLD WEATHER BROCCOLI PASTA
… 1 large head broccoli (about 1 1/4 to 1 1/2 pounds)
… 2 tablespoons extra-virgin olive oil
… Kosher salt
… 1 to 2 teaspoons red pepper flakes, or to taste
… 1 quart low-sodium chicken stock
… 1/2 pound whole-wheat capellini pasta
… 1 cup freshly grated Parmigiano-Reggiano cheese
Heat the oven to 450 degrees. Position one of the racks in the top third of the oven.
Bring a large pot of water to a boil.
Cut the broccoli, including the stems, into 2-inch pieces. Peel any thick stem pieces to remove the thick skin.
On a rimmed baking sheet, arrange the broccoli in a single layer. Drizzle with the oil, then sprinkle with salt to taste and toss well. Place on the top oven rack and roast for 8 to 10 minutes, or until the broccoli is crisp tender and slightly brown at the edges. Transfer the broccoli to a large skillet, add the pepper flakes and the chicken broth, then bring to a boil over medium-high heat.
When the water in the large pot comes to a boil, add a hefty pinch of salt and the pasta. Stir and cook for 2 minutes, or until the pasta is limp but not quite cooked through. Drain the pasta and transfer it to the broccoli pan. Simmer for 2 minutes, or until the pasta is al dente. Stir in the Parmigiano-Reggiano and salt to taste. Ladle into shallow soup bowls and serve with crusty bread. Makes 4 servings.
Per serving: 470 calories; 160 calories from fat (34 percent of total calories); 17 g fat (5 g saturated; 0 g trans fats); 20 mg cholesterol; 54 g carbohydrate; 9 g fiber; 5 g sugar; 25 g protein; 870 mg sodium.
.
…………………………………….
.
.
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
.
.
Comments are closed.